From 'whitewashing' to zero in less than 14 days

Status
Not open for further replies.
who am i and how can i explain????:eek:
i am not lcw
i am not cl
i am not umpire of lcw vs cl
i not in india
i not in the stadium
i didnt watch the match....

so,conclusion is....how do i know?what can i know?:confused:
then i had overestimated u as a boleh fan:D:p
 
then i had overestimated u as a boleh fan:D:p

label me as what u like....only those that though they are clever enough will comment on something he/she haven't witness(for example:say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing)

i admit i am not clever....so it is ok...
when someone ACT to be clever...bcer will see how stupid he/she is...;)
 
label me as what u like....only those that though they are clever enough will comment on something he/she haven't witness(for example:say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing)

i admit i am not clever....so it is ok...
when someone ACT to be clever...bcer will see how stupid he/she is...;)
LOL, that didn't stop pjswift, xball, dr. evil, etc....

I wholeheartedly welcome other to judge.
That is why i'm not proppent on posts deletion
 
Last edited:
I wholeheartedly welcome other to judge.

Is that wise to judge others' opinion, sir? It's your right to say LCW's this and that, and it's our right to keep it the other way around. Any disagreement, share your thoughts.
Can we put it as that?
Discussions in Bc will be much more enjoyable.
 
Last edited:
say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing;)

well, let the record speak for itself.

LD wasn't generous to LCW at 08 OG MSF
LD let lcw earn more points in 09 AE MSF
LD gave LCW the swiss open MS title.

see the generosity???
 
Is that wise to judge others' opinion, sir? It's your right to say LCW's this and that, and it's our right to keep it the other way around.
Can we leave it at that?
Discussions in Bc will be much more enjoyable.
u r just supporting what i have said.
i am not pro posts deletion = anyone can say what they wish, is this equation clear enough? it is quite kindergarten math.
 
Last edited:
well, let the record speak for itself.

LD wasn't generous to LCW at 08 OG MSF
LD let lcw earn more points in 09 AE MSF
LD GAVE LCW the swiss open MS title.

see the generosity???

keep saying that...as more as u want...the more u say...the more the people know how clever u are...:)...
 
u r just supporting what i have said.
i am not pro posts deletion = anyone can say what they wish, is this equation clear enough? it is quite kindergarten math.
Recognize the limitation. We should be able to have arguments, not disputes.
Delete the post if it's offensive. if not, keep it.
I stand corrected to whatever i am saying.

btw, is that wrong to support your opinion if i found myself to agree with it?
I disagree before not because you are cooler, you know?
 
Recognize the limitation. We should be able to have arguments, not disputes.
Delete the post if it's offensive. if not, keep it.
I stand corrected to whatever i am saying.

btw, is that wrong to support your opinion if i found myself to agree with it?
I disagree before not because you are cooler, you know?
i'm glad u like talking to yourself. See, i ain't stopping ya either:)
(unless u start dating pemuda, i might be more careful here)


i'm having a fun day today. Here i am debating about badminton stuff and then i flip screen and go at it with my work colleages on MS Outlook lol.
 
Last edited:
cooler, well, i don't like it to be endless again, i'll straight forwardly saying, give cooperation.

lemme say, even if i'm dating him, he won't go backing me up merely because of that.
You should know him better than anyone else here.
 
cooler, well, i don't like it to be endless again, i'll straight forwardly saying, give cooperation.

lemme say, even if i'm dating him, he won't go backing me up merely because of that.
You should know him better than anyone else here.
sorry, i haven't dated pemuda before...:D Wouldn't know:p
 
Chong Wei had paid the price for the lesson of being bored with the hotel food. Whatever he said is not going to help him to justify his lost to Chen Long since people already made the conclusion that he "underestimate" CL, giving excuses, Chen Long is simply better player that day, etc. Players have good days and bad days and it is unfortunate for CW to be unwell during the match. People can criticize all they want but i believe action speaks louder than word.

Well, another reason could be a conspiracy theory which i shall not mention here as it's controversial. So, look for the consistency of the player's performance base on their meetings. CL had beaten CW once on his bad day and if can beat him on his good days, than we can say CL is in par with the world top players. Having said that, i think credit should be given to CL and he is definitely one of the players to watch in the future.
 
Firstly remember to talk about the subject not about each other.....this quickly falls into animosity.....



i don't think so. PBSI can drop yonex if they wish when they can find a better sponsor. The china team did. Li Ning even allow CHN players to use yonex product in 09 AE. Also, from the latest photo, some chinese players still wearing yonex shoes.

I believe so..look at Japan Open, now you understand why all players ( sponsored by Yonex) have to be there...of course CHN will send theirplayers this year to Japan Open but not obligated as much as before since CHN is sponsored by Li Ning now...
LOL - Who is right?!!:confused::confused: Cooler - The China move could be a key change, they have freed up more money for yonex to offer to other indepedents thus moving towards a more professional sport. http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22956 Post #8 by myself in 2005 I think we needed a rival to give competition to Yonex, Maybe we are now getting this in sponsorship terms? And if PBSI can drop malaysia and choose the tournaments they want to play in 100% why don't they? Do they like being dictated to by Yonex??

Huangkwokhau - I hope so, for badminton's sake
who am i and how can i explain????:eek:
i am not lcw
i am not cl
i am not umpire of lcw vs cl
i not in india
i not in the stadium
i didnt watch the match....

so,conclusion is....how do i know?what can i know?:confused:

LOL:D:D
 
those tennis players have their own manager that will take care of everything except play tennis. will take precaution of food poisoning too. if it still happen, cant blame them so much. but in this case, LCW took the risk of food poisoning. why he takes that kind of risk?

You should ask, the other players who ate together with him, also took the risk - since they also eat the food outside hotel ? And yes, they won their matches, LCW lost in R1, some of our back up also lost in 1st day but since they're lower ranked, we dont think much of it.

And some people, eating at the same table, same food also, from renowned restaurant also, 1 person can get food poisoning, other people are fine, then how to explain? All these from personal experiences, though I'm not the unfortunate victim, the victim, so happen is often the one that normally careful about where they eat out & very clean one. We joke & say our stomach too trained with all the germs, so not effected (eagle stomach very well trained in stall food - not rich mah).
Meaning : the careful ppl kena. You can believe or say I just simply make up the story ;)

And of course, as already discussed, mean LCW must be sooo strong, sick also must win :D.
 
So, in light of the food poisoning issue being LCW's own reason for his lost..

..i guess we can cautiously conclude, whoever survives any sort of food poisoning in the upcoming WC, he or she will most likely win the title..:cool:
 
Overall like I said originally he lost because CL was the better player on the day. I am dissapointed LCW has now made the excuse as well as giving the reason for his loss. IMO he misunderestimated him, even an unwell LCW should be beating CL....
i've heard that a chess world champion never won a match against a 'well and fit' opponent, always excuses, excuses. how difficult it is to say i'm worng or i was rubbish today? well, ask mr brown.
 
Last edited:
LOL - Who is right?!!:confused::confused: Cooler - The China move could be a key change, they have freed up more money for yonex to offer to other indepedents thus moving towards a more professional sport. http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22956 Post #8 by myself in 2005 I think we needed a rival to give competition to Yonex, Maybe we are now getting this in sponsorship terms? And if PBSI can drop malaysia and choose the tournaments they want to play in 100% why don't they? Do they like being dictated to by Yonex??
No doubt it's a key change, for LN, china team and yonex. I do however, feel that this was a blow to yonex, and a coup for LN. No way did yonex let LN take their china account for the sake of 'improving badminton popularity'. LN won because they can sponsors the top players at 'bulk discount' price since most of the best players are in the china team and LN is also a chinese company, lots of synergy to milk off that yonex can't.. What yonex got are more money for the sunset pros like TH, PG. Good for them but is it really better for yonex? Sure yonex now have more money to put into emerging countries like EU, north/south america,africa, india if they wish to but as a business maybe not so good. It's like yonex fund the R&D and biggies like nike, LN, or wilson come in afterward to scoop up the fruit bearing tree. Krisna i'm sure thinks like this too:p


btw, shouldnt this be in a different thread:confused::D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top