then i had overestimated u as a boleh fanwho am i and how can i explain????
i am not lcw
i am not cl
i am not umpire of lcw vs cl
i not in india
i not in the stadium
i didnt watch the match....
so,conclusion is....how do i know?what can i know?![]()


then i had overestimated u as a boleh fanwho am i and how can i explain????
i am not lcw
i am not cl
i am not umpire of lcw vs cl
i not in india
i not in the stadium
i didnt watch the match....
so,conclusion is....how do i know?what can i know?![]()
then i had overestimated u as a boleh fan![]()
LOL, that didn't stop pjswift, xball, dr. evil, etc....label me as what u like....only those that though they are clever enough will comment on something he/she haven't witness(for example:say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing)
i admit i am not clever....so it is ok...
when someone ACT to be clever...bcer will see how stupid he/she is...![]()
say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing
LOL, that didn't stop pjswift, xball, dr. evil, etc....
I wholeheartedly welcome other to judge.
say lindan is generous when he is frustrated and disapointed when he is trailing![]()
u r just supporting what i have said.Is that wise to judge others' opinion, sir? It's your right to say LCW's this and that, and it's our right to keep it the other way around.
Can we leave it at that?
Discussions in Bc will be much more enjoyable.
well, let the record speak for itself.
LD wasn't generous to LCW at 08 OG MSF
LD let lcw earn more points in 09 AE MSF
LD GAVE LCW the swiss open MS title.
see the generosity???
i am and therefore it iskeep saying that...as more as u want...the more u say...the more the people know how clever u are......
Recognize the limitation. We should be able to have arguments, not disputes.u r just supporting what i have said.
i am not pro posts deletion = anyone can say what they wish, is this equation clear enough? it is quite kindergarten math.
i'm glad u like talking to yourself. See, i ain't stopping ya eitherRecognize the limitation. We should be able to have arguments, not disputes.
Delete the post if it's offensive. if not, keep it.
I stand corrected to whatever i am saying.
btw, is that wrong to support your opinion if i found myself to agree with it?
I disagree before not because you are cooler, you know?
sorry, i haven't dated pemuda before...cooler, well, i don't like it to be endless again, i'll straight forwardly saying, give cooperation.
lemme say, even if i'm dating him, he won't go backing me up merely because of that.
You should know him better than anyone else here.
i don't think so. PBSI can drop yonex if they wish when they can find a better sponsor. The china team did. Li Ning even allow CHN players to use yonex product in 09 AE. Also, from the latest photo, some chinese players still wearing yonex shoes.
LOL - Who is right?!!I believe so..look at Japan Open, now you understand why all players ( sponsored by Yonex) have to be there...of course CHN will send theirplayers this year to Japan Open but not obligated as much as before since CHN is sponsored by Li Ning now...
who am i and how can i explain????
i am not lcw
i am not cl
i am not umpire of lcw vs cl
i not in india
i not in the stadium
i didnt watch the match....
so,conclusion is....how do i know?what can i know?![]()
those tennis players have their own manager that will take care of everything except play tennis. will take precaution of food poisoning too. if it still happen, cant blame them so much. but in this case, LCW took the risk of food poisoning. why he takes that kind of risk?
i've heard that a chess world champion never won a match against a 'well and fit' opponent, always excuses, excuses. how difficult it is to say i'm worng or i was rubbish today? well, ask mr brown.Overall like I said originally he lost because CL was the better player on the day. I am dissapointed LCW has now made the excuse as well as giving the reason for his loss. IMO he misunderestimated him, even an unwell LCW should be beating CL....
awhhhh, how come you won't let LD help develop him too:crying:
LOL
No doubt it's a key change, for LN, china team and yonex. I do however, feel that this was a blow to yonex, and a coup for LN. No way did yonex let LN take their china account for the sake of 'improving badminton popularity'. LN won because they can sponsors the top players at 'bulk discount' price since most of the best players are in the china team and LN is also a chinese company, lots of synergy to milk off that yonex can't.. What yonex got are more money for the sunset pros like TH, PG. Good for them but is it really better for yonex? Sure yonex now have more money to put into emerging countries like EU, north/south america,africa, india if they wish to but as a business maybe not so good. It's like yonex fund the R&D and biggies like nike, LN, or wilson come in afterward to scoop up the fruit bearing tree. Krisna i'm sure thinks like this tooLOL - Who is right?!!Cooler - The China move could be a key change, they have freed up more money for yonex to offer to other indepedents thus moving towards a more professional sport. http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22956 Post #8 by myself in 2005 I think we needed a rival to give competition to Yonex, Maybe we are now getting this in sponsorship terms? And if PBSI can drop malaysia and choose the tournaments they want to play in 100% why don't they? Do they like being dictated to by Yonex??