Not true. Its relative. Based on demand-supply. India is a poor nation.Yet our cricket tournaments offer higher prize money than UK or Australia.
that's why I said : in many case...lol
Looks like your reading skills are as pathetic as your comprehension skills. (Sorry for the personal attack, you are getting on my nerves again.) Go read post 80 AGAIN and this time PLEASE donot miss the 80s part.....
you have a problem with your logic.
really a big problem.
remember the "overtake" issue ?
ok lets to stay on topic.
first of all, what is the relation between Susi never won china open and the Swedish - French which is more lucrative than chn and mal ?
second, LLW won all of the above events, CHN, Mal, Swe, and French, while Susi never won Chn and French
third, 1989 still in 80's era, right ? so why Susi didn't attend Swedish - AE - French just like Li Lingwei ?
almost retire LLW can participate in 3 events in a row while susi is affraid though susi was 7 years younger with the greatest ?
so tell me, what is the relation between susi never won china and the lucrative of Swedish and French ?