Hi,Bro where's the review on this beauty.. Feel, feedback, swing... Is it just a beauty or Beast too..
,stunning beauty.
Then maybe you should treat this forum with more photos of the beauty(whenever someone asks for a review).Hi,
Sadly, I have not had enough sessions with it to write something about but indeed it is a treat to the eyes.,stunning beauty.
May be in another 3-4 days I will be in a position to do so.
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
If you spread wrong informations or informations which are lacking own experience, it's vital to correct you. If you don't accept that you spread misleading informations, which will cause negativity (people spend money for rackets because of your misleading information and promise) it's IMO a must as fellow member to stop such misleading to maintain the quality of the forum. BC was always and is always a place of objective informations, shared user experiences and the real deal. If we start to not silence wrong informations, people still buy these rackets, which are not worth the money and companies still get away to produce faulty products. If you don't respect and accept this because you don't wanna be the noob and await to agree with you, I won't agree with you. The ARC11 is a good racket, but in terms of durability for serious tensions a faulty product, whose durabilty is a shame for such a pricing. period.
Agree.. but you tone is rude and disrespectful.. and that is not contributing to anything but fuelling your ego.. What you call serious tensions is upto the player.. and regarding durability..mine lasted 7 years with regular stringing of above 25lbs with occasional replacement of grommets.
Sigh. There are worse ways to be disrespectful, like completely disregarding what the other person is saying. There was at least one other person saying the same thing. Quite frankly I'm surprised ucantsee kept it as objective as he did and took time to explain everything. I would've given up trying to educate people who don't take their time to listen and base their reasoning on just one unsubstantiated statement.
.I have played with n9ii,900i, Asrtrox77,n7ii Lite and recently Tectonic 7C ,so you can see most of them are more flex than the specifications of TC80.However,even in those days of struggle,there were few excellent drops ,smashes and slices which left everyone stunned.) thanks for the review!Hi, spent quite a number of hours playing with TC80.Hence thought of sharing my feelings.
Strung with Kizuna D61 at 25~26 (same as Tectonic 7C) to better understand both the racquets.Right after I got it strung,CLEARLY ,I felt the head heaviness.
Struggled a couple of days as I had slowly got used to Tectonic 7C.I was hitting the frame or there were mishits,mistimed shots,you name it.The struggle was so bad, that I felt like keeping this back in the bag.I have played with n9ii,900i, Asrtrox77,n7ii Lite and recently Tectonic 7C ,so you can see most of them are more flex than the specifications of TC80.However,even in those days of struggle,there were few excellent drops ,smashes and slices which left everyone stunned.
I think it was from the last game on the 2nd day and from 3rd day onwards I got used to TC80. And boy, it is a gem. A gem both in departments of paint job and the way it plays.
Played continuously with it for 6-7 days and I was on top of my game. After may be a week, just for a day,(played for 6 matches), I switched back to Tectonic to see how I fared with it and the result was, I had no control, ABSOLUTELY none . My smashes went way out, some smashes I was trying for the line ,it went miles out. Even worse, my lifts were going out.
No disrespect to Tectonic 7C, it is a great racquet. May be my arm or muscle memory got used to TC80.
Next day, back to Tc80 and back to winning ways.
It is stiff ,hence what you get is, phenomenal control, I cant stress on how well I can control my drives,slices and drops.
Some may think its a 4U ,smashes won't be powerful enough, one couldn't be more wrong,the head heaviness counts a lot here.It delivers powerful smashes and with unmatchable precision. It is noticeably head heavy and stiff, the moment you hold it you shall realise that(not Zforce2 users
Defence, no issues, the frame is pretty damn fast. I hope all n9ii or turbocharging series users can relate to what i mean.
I am so much in love with it that I am considering to buy another but because of the high cost and already stretched out wallet ,I have to wait for a month or two.
Overall
If you are looking for a raquet of around 4U, head heavy ,stiff shaft ,fast frame,a paint job that is difficult to take your eyes off and willing to shell out the amount,look no further, you search culminates here,you shall totally love it. Even if you don't fall in love playing with it, you shall surely be mesmerised by its beauty.
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
i would assume that Tec7C frame are quite repulsive so that just a little power would send the shuttle fly far away. Probably due to the classic box frame which that transfer our power more efficient but due to the boxy frame it hold the air much than TC frame & resulting miss timing on your shot.Strung with Kizuna D61 at 25~26 (same as Tectonic 7C) to better understand both the racquets.Right after I got it strung,CLEARLY ,I felt the head heaviness.
Struggled a couple of days as I had slowly got used to Tectonic 7C.I was hitting the frame or there were mishits,mistimed shots,you name it.The struggle was so bad, that I felt like keeping this back in the bag
I switched back to Tectonic to see how I fared with it and the result was, I had no control, ABSOLUTELY none . My smashes went way out, some smashes I was trying for the line ,it went miles out. Even worse, my lifts were going out.
No disrespect to Tectonic 7C, it is a great racquet. May be my arm or muscle memory got used to TC80.
The informations must be enough. We are at an international board. I'm not native englisch speaking, cultures are different. But I find it disrespectful that somebody analyse my intentions as ego-boosting or says "Chill old man".
Great for you but not representative with n=1. My experience is from a douzen from my clients. Full grommet switch at least after the 4th job job and replacement with high quality grommets. Highest tension was 24lbs.
The same goes for Duora 10 or JS12. Also popular in the pro circuit. Many pros go through 50 rackets a year and that's not the highest number. Use the search function the results will back what I say, the interviews with the players will back up what I say. Feel free to drop Bodin Issara a message how it was when he stand at the YGO 2017 infront of a bunch of broken ARC11 in the stringing booth. If players need to buy them, they would make different choices.
Now this is a proper way to handle this...We are cool man..I believe everyone including me in this forum respects your experience and opinions and really appreciate your inputs and insights.
Hi, spent quite a number of hours playing with TC80.Hence thought of sharing my feelings.
Strung with Kizuna D61 at 25~26 (same as Tectonic 7C) to better understand both the racquets.Right after I got it strung,CLEARLY ,I felt the head heaviness.
Struggled a couple of days as I had slowly got used to Tectonic 7C.I was hitting the frame or there were mishits,mistimed shots,you name it.The struggle was so bad, that I felt like keeping this back in the bag
I think it was from the last game on the 2nd day and from 3rd day onwards I got used to TC80. And boy, it is a gem. A gem both in departments of paint job and the way it plays.
Played continuously with it for 6-7 days and I was on top of my game. After may be a week, just for a day,(played for 6 matches), I switched back to Tectonic to see how I fared with it and the result was, I had no control, ABSOLUTELY none . My smashes went way out, some smashes I was trying for the line ,it went miles out. Even worse, my lifts were going out.
No disrespect to Tectonic 7C, it is a great racquet. May be my arm or muscle memory got used to TC80.
Next day, back to Tc80 and back to winning ways.
It is stiff ,hence what you get is, phenomenal control, I cant stress on how well I can control my drives,slices and drops.
Some may think its a 4U ,smashes won't be powerful enough, one couldn't be more wrong,the head heaviness counts a lot here.It delivers powerful smashes and with unmatchable precision. It is noticeably head heavy and stiff, the moment you hold it you shall realise that(not Zforce2 users
Defence, no issues, the frame is pretty damn fast. I hope all n9ii or turbocharging series users can relate to what i mean.
I am so much in love with it that I am considering to buy another but because of the high cost and already stretched out wallet ,I have to wait for a month or two.
Overall
If you are looking for a raquet of around 4U, head heavy ,stiff shaft ,fast frame,a paint job that is difficult to take your eyes off and willing to shell out the amount,look no further, you search culminates here,you shall totally love it. Even if you don't fall in love playing with it, you shall surely be mesmerised by its beauty.
Not sure if it's just the two I tried, but the 9000 and 9000C are remarkably similar to each other.
Aeronaut 9000C is very very good! You can even try your hands on Aeronaut 7000C.
Trudat... It's like going on a date with a girl totally out of your league and trying to impress her in ways you didn't even know you could
do you have the aeronaut 7000c? able to compare it to aeronaut 9000c? im deciding between these two rackets
I have placed an order for 9000C but it would take 12-15 days to arrive.. 7000C I had tried one of my friend's and felt good control over drives,clears and half smashes. With 9000c I felt it had more power.