No. Turning a racket is not the only change that you can make.
Of course it isn't. I never said it was.
And in the post you just replied to, I asked you if when you said he is changing grip, you meant his racket was turning. "Do you mean his racket turns in his hand and isn't maintaining a forehand grip?"
That is not the same as assuming that when you said changing grip, you meant his racket was turning
The fact that I asked the question "Do you mean his racket turns in his hand", should suggest to you that I think it's possible you might mean something else..
It seems what you meant when you said he is changing his grip, was he is using his fingers to squeeze the racket into the palm of his hand. that doesn't really need a picture. There's no question there of what does it mean to use the fingers to squeeze the racket.
That's normal badminton to squeeze the racket, that's just use of fingers. That's not just him(as you know). Though of course you may be suggesting he is doing that while holding the handle lower than others.
I have never heard of somebody calling that(use of the fingers to squeeze the handle to the palm, as is universally done), "changing grip" as you did.
Hence I asked. . There's no assumption there in that question.
After that, I did consider the possibility that you meant his racket was turning. and (outside of a live communicaton scenario/platform), there's nothing wrong with considering if you meant something. You could simply say no you didn't mean that, you meant squeezing his fingers. (And yeah then anything I wrote that considers the possibility that you meant something you didn't, you can ignore the one or two paragraphs based off that, when you've stated that you didn't mean that).
In the event that you meant squeezing the grip(which I had actually considered and you apparently did), I have no question about that - squeezing. There's nothing strange or unusual about that, nothing I have to ask regarding that. Squeezing the racket into the palm is a standard thing. It doesn't need a picture. And I never asked what squeezing the grip means. Not that you even used that expression. I had considered that when you said changing the grip, that it's possible you meant squeezing the racket, (Hence I asked the question rather than just assumed), but I had nothing to ask re that possibility. And what i've been asking is more about unusual things re the technique shown in the video.
Also, people speak of low grip, high grip, (those are change of grips that don't involve racket turning), forehand grip, thumb grip, various racket turns, that's the usual sense of changing the grip. So it was a fair question to ask.
I guess it might have been simpler for you if i'd have asked do you mean W?X? other? And not said Do you mean W? And addressed that possibility, when there was a possibility that you didn't. Obviously in the event you meant squeezing the grip(which it turned out you meant), there's nothing to say re that.That's no difference between him squeezing the grip and anybody else e.g. into the palm.. that's normal. I've been asking about some unusual things re that technique in the video, vs the more modern technique. And i've asked some questions regarding what is going on with that technique in contrast to a more standard or modern technique.
I think you probably know you used absurd terminology by referring to squeezing the grip as changing the grip.. 'cos by your way of speaking , almost anybody doing a forehand overhead would change grip during the swing. Nobody would say or imply that you should change grip during the swing,other than you 'cos nobody uses that phrase that way, and it wouldn't surprise me if you have not used that phrase that way in any other thread. And I reckon your giant picture of squeezing the grip was agenda driven(similar to your other recent reply to me). And you knew there was no question about what squeezing the grip meant.