Last night I was having a discussion with a player. I handled his racquet and compared it with mine. We were discussing a forecourt technique and about holding the racquet.
For my racquet, each of the bevels are quite obvious. Mine is a G5, with a thin grip under layer and the bevels are quite obvious.
When demonstrating, I noticed his short bevels were not so clear as my racquet and his racquet handle feels more circular. I didnt think to mention it at the time because we were concentrating on other things. However , reflecting later, it’s possible at the learning stage of changing technique, this lack of the short bevel might be a detriment.
Anybody have an opinion on that?
I also notice in Asia, people tend to have much thinner grip diameters. For instance YY G4 I don’t think I have seen in Asia for many years.
For my racquet, each of the bevels are quite obvious. Mine is a G5, with a thin grip under layer and the bevels are quite obvious.
When demonstrating, I noticed his short bevels were not so clear as my racquet and his racquet handle feels more circular. I didnt think to mention it at the time because we were concentrating on other things. However , reflecting later, it’s possible at the learning stage of changing technique, this lack of the short bevel might be a detriment.
Anybody have an opinion on that?
I also notice in Asia, people tend to have much thinner grip diameters. For instance YY G4 I don’t think I have seen in Asia for many years.
Last edited: